Showing posts with label Michael Kenneth Walker slanderous accusations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Kenneth Walker slanderous accusations. Show all posts
TFMCS removed the "TRASH" in leadership
Has TFMCS removed the "TRASH" in leadership ? Has TFMCS clean up the TOXIC and poisonous members ?
HAM Radio recording of my voice Friday January 06 2017 on BrandMeister
The last 2 years of using Toronto CANADA BandMeister I have never had issues, recently in two weeks on the Toronto CANADA BrandMeister repeater someone is playing back my audio.
It seems the same "MO" as the person that is recording audio on the local analog repeater VE3TWR and playing it back the same way.
HAM Radio someone playing back audio recordings of my voice Friday January 06 2017 on BrandMeister
http://hose.brandmeister.network/310/archive/2017/01/06/
The signal and the RSSI changed ..... when the recording was played back ..... (SEE PICTURE)
Industry Canada review and Stop this !!!!
The last 2 years of using Toronto CANADA BandMeister I have never had issues, recently in two weeks on the Toronto CANADA BrandMeister repeater someone is playing back my audio.
It seems the same "MO" as the person that is recording audio on the local analog repeater VE3TWR and playing it back the same way.
It seems the same "MO" as the person that is recording audio on the local analog repeater VE3TWR and playing it back the same way.
HAM Radio someone playing back audio recordings of my voice Friday January 06 2017 on BrandMeister
http://hose.brandmeister.network/310/archive/2017/01/06/
The signal and the RSSI changed ..... when the recording was played back ..... (SEE PICTURE)
Industry Canada review and Stop this !!!!
The last 2 years of using Toronto CANADA BandMeister I have never had issues, recently in two weeks on the Toronto CANADA BrandMeister repeater someone is playing back my audio.
It seems the same "MO" as the person that is recording audio on the local analog repeater VE3TWR and playing it back the same way.
DMR repeater PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU disgraceful conduct
DMR repeater PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU disgraceful conduct
An Email To the DMR repeater owner :
My drive into the city of Toronto today with Family and Friends in the car Thursday December 22 at 5:45 was received with the conversations similar from the analog repeater VE3TWR in a typical oppressive manor. That ranged from the trash in his conversation for the full period of his resentment. The alienating topics has not been experienced on DMR since last heard on TFMCS ve3twr.
The company in my car was "disgusted" by the repeat reference to the word "appliance operator" and based on the etymology of the word it sicken many people. The emails received disgusted many individual and it was typical of hatred from this Ham VE3KU of TFMCS repeater. Is that what we are now on DMR? Is that who we are? It seems alienating.
I DO NOT understand the resentment and why the conversation over the last two weeks.
Please help me understand the repeated daily abusive and use of "appliance operator" what is this innuendos. Why use a system with so much hatred for it.
Please help me understand the repeated daily abusive and use of "appliance operator" what is this innuendos. Why use a system with so much hatred for it.
I fail to understand the hatred and suttle innuendos that have been recent over the last week or two weeks. Why use DMR if you are favorable to other modes DStar. What is the many on DMR thinking when hearing these discussions ? What will family members think when listening to these conversations on DMR ?
I join the (MARC) Motorola Amateur Radio Club. I do not care who uses what device. On DMR the conversation have been recently divisive and full of innuendos and the over used by negative discussions. Not healthy to listen to and abusive.
He seems to be a good writer and story teller, but his blog is filled with so much blatant lies and hatred, is this someone that is representatives of TFMCS and the VE3TWR repeater in Toronto CANADA.
I hope PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU HATRED may stop
I hope PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU HATRED may stop
TFMCS VE3TWR 444.400 LACK OF GOVERNANCE - Spectrum Management and Telecommunications
TFMCS VE3TWR 444.400 LACK OF GOVERNANCE - Spectrum Management and Telecommunications
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Good Day Ma.....
Hope this email meets you with happiness and good health.
Mal.... after reaching out to you and speaking to you about the ABUSE at the TFMCS repeaters system. Thank for your suggestion to over look and laugh it off.
This evening I have started the ball rolling.
Ma...... today again as in the last 3 years for the TFMCS repeater VE3TWR I listened to hours of ABUSE and replayed recordings. It seems the TFMCS repeater controller may not have been available as the typical "LACK OF GOVERNANCE" on the TFMCS repeaters, I attempted to call for a repeater controller for more than an hour.
With children in my home and trash coming out of the TFMCS repeater, maybe it is time to shut down and remove this repeater from use?
Please help, does anyone wish to stop the Trash coming from the Toronto CANADA repeater VE3TWR 444.400. The absence of a repeater controller after listening for about 3 hours.
The two hours or more of trash coming out of the TFMCS repeater and the lack of a repeater controller for two or three hour or someone to shut down the repeater show incompetent in this TFMCS group.
My question is please can you provide escalation details for the TFMCS repeater group ? The Legal Name of the GROUP ??
Repeater owner / operator liability exposure
http://ve3twr.blogspot.ca/2017/01/repeater-owner-operator-liability.html
Spectrum Management and Telecommunications
All spectrum publications are available on ISED’s Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Official Publications Web page.
Warmest Regards, I am so pleased this is only a hobby.
sign
-------- Forwarded Message --------
| Subject: | Fwd: Re: TFMCS VE3TWR 444.400 LACK OF GOVERNANCE - Spectrum Management and Telecommunications |
|---|---|
| Date: | , X Jan 2017 00:00:00 -0500 |
| From: | V....... |
| Organization: | VA..... |
| To: | ke..... |
| CC: | ...... |
Good Day Ma.....
Hope this email meets you with happiness and good health.
Mal.... after reaching out to you and speaking to you about the ABUSE at the TFMCS repeaters system. Thank for your suggestion to over look and laugh it off.
This evening I have started the ball rolling.
Ma...... today again as in the last 3 years for the TFMCS repeater VE3TWR I listened to hours of ABUSE and replayed recordings. It seems the TFMCS repeater controller may not have been available as the typical "LACK OF GOVERNANCE" on the TFMCS repeaters, I attempted to call for a repeater controller for more than an hour.
With children in my home and trash coming out of the TFMCS repeater, maybe it is time to shut down and remove this repeater from use?
Please help, does anyone wish to stop the Trash coming from the Toronto CANADA repeater VE3TWR 444.400. The absence of a repeater controller after listening for about 3 hours.
The two hours or more of trash coming out of the TFMCS repeater and the lack of a repeater controller for two or three hour or someone to shut down the repeater show incompetent in this TFMCS group.
My question is please can you provide escalation details for the TFMCS repeater group ? The Legal Name of the GROUP ??
Repeater owner / operator liability exposure
http://ve3twr.blogspot.ca/2017/01/repeater-owner-operator-liability.html
Spectrum Management and Telecommunications
All spectrum publications are available on ISED’s Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Official Publications Web page.
Warmest Regards, I am so pleased this is only a hobby.
sign
TFMCS VE3TWR 444.400 LACK OF GOVERNANCE
TFMCS VE3TWR 444.400 LACK OF GOVERNANCE
TORONTO, CANADA
HOW DO WE GO LEGAL ?
RIC-3 — Information on the Amateur Radio Service
RP-25 – Policy Principles for Public Safety Radio Interoperability
RBR-4 — Standards for the Operation of Radio Stations in the Amateur Radio Service
Industry Canada we directed you here
TORONTO, CANADA
HOW DO WE GO LEGAL ?
RIC-3 — Information on the Amateur Radio Service
RP-25 – Policy Principles for Public Safety Radio Interoperability
RBR-4 — Standards for the Operation of Radio Stations in the Amateur Radio Service
Industry Canada we directed you here
Repeater owner / operator liability exposure
Repeater owner / operator liability exposure
With the painful and expensive lessons learned, it seems the litigants in the NCPRN kerfuffle have settled
In the matter of Kenneth Bryant v. NCPRN, Scott Whitaker and Wade Hampton, Jr., this issue has been resolved. We regret this matter occurred and acknowledge that it could have been handled better, and regret some of the unfortunate public comments made pertaining to this litigation and to Mr. Bryant. It is in the best interests of Amateur Radio that this matter be resolved without further litigation.
Of course the greater community must talk about this case as it highlights the exposure repeater system operators have concerning liabilities resulting from actions that cause defamation per se, injury, or other harm to a person's reputation, etc. Just because you
have the federal legal authority to ban someone on your repeater does NOT immunize you from liability if it was done for illegal or injurious purposes... even if incidental or accidental. To think otherwise is reckless.
To all repeater operators thinking the FCC rules shield them from all things, consider the following scenarios:
Ban repeater user for causing interference? No problem so long as you amass "and archive" sufficient evidence.
Ban repeater user for being black (or female, or Hispanic, etc.)? You will be sued out of existence and rightfully so.
Ban repeater user for "unsubstantiated" poor/illicit conduct causing defamation per se? You might be sued and rightfully so.
The point is the FCC doesn't give one carte blanche to violate other rights a citizen may have. Think I'm wrong? Lawyers, please tell me where.
The other key takeaway from this case is the notion NCPRN declared itself not an organization while acting like one towards the plaintiff. Hence the plaintiff sued NCPRN and all the "members" within it. It isn't clear a precedent was set on this particular aspect, but I think it is safe to say one can't pretend an organization isn't one when it is clearly active and acting "organized."
In the matter of Kenneth Bryant v. NCPRN, Scott Whitaker and Wade Hampton, Jr., this issue has been resolved. We regret this matter occurred and acknowledge that it could have been handled better, and regret some of the unfortunate public comments made pertaining to this litigation and to Mr. Bryant. It is in the best interests of Amateur Radio that this matter be resolved without further litigation.
Network privileges for Kenneth Bryant are restored.
The parties ask the community not to discuss this matter further.
http://ncprn.net/?p=517
With the painful and expensive lessons learned, it seems the litigants in the NCPRN kerfuffle have settled
In the matter of Kenneth Bryant v. NCPRN, Scott Whitaker and Wade Hampton, Jr., this issue has been resolved. We regret this matter occurred and acknowledge that it could have been handled better, and regret some of the unfortunate public comments made pertaining to this litigation and to Mr. Bryant. It is in the best interests of Amateur Radio that this matter be resolved without further litigation.
Of course the greater community must talk about this case as it highlights the exposure repeater system operators have concerning liabilities resulting from actions that cause defamation per se, injury, or other harm to a person's reputation, etc. Just because you
have the federal legal authority to ban someone on your repeater does NOT immunize you from liability if it was done for illegal or injurious purposes... even if incidental or accidental. To think otherwise is reckless.
To all repeater operators thinking the FCC rules shield them from all things, consider the following scenarios:
Ban repeater user for causing interference? No problem so long as you amass "and archive" sufficient evidence.
Ban repeater user for being black (or female, or Hispanic, etc.)? You will be sued out of existence and rightfully so.
Ban repeater user for "unsubstantiated" poor/illicit conduct causing defamation per se? You might be sued and rightfully so.
The point is the FCC doesn't give one carte blanche to violate other rights a citizen may have. Think I'm wrong? Lawyers, please tell me where.
The other key takeaway from this case is the notion NCPRN declared itself not an organization while acting like one towards the plaintiff. Hence the plaintiff sued NCPRN and all the "members" within it. It isn't clear a precedent was set on this particular aspect, but I think it is safe to say one can't pretend an organization isn't one when it is clearly active and acting "organized."
In the matter of Kenneth Bryant v. NCPRN, Scott Whitaker and Wade Hampton, Jr., this issue has been resolved. We regret this matter occurred and acknowledge that it could have been handled better, and regret some of the unfortunate public comments made pertaining to this litigation and to Mr. Bryant. It is in the best interests of Amateur Radio that this matter be resolved without further litigation.
Network privileges for Kenneth Bryant are restored.
The parties ask the community not to discuss this matter further.
http://ncprn.net/?p=517
Canada Lands Company REMOVE the Toronto amateur radio repeater
Canada Lands Company
CN Tower REMOVE the Toronto amateur radio repeater
By :: TFMCS Toronto FM Communications Society
Emails to and directing attention to this abuse, newspapers escalating to this website and other abuse.
Canada Lands Company (CN Tower) - WE CONTACTED YOU TO HAVE THE REPEATER REMOVED
Canada Lands Company (CN Tower) - WE CONTACTED YOU TO HAVE THE REPEATER REMOVED
CN Tower REMOVE the Toronto amateur radio repeater
CN Tower REMOVE the Toronto amateur radio repeater from your site / location.
We are contacting the CN Tower and promoting they REMOVE the amateur radio repeater run by TFMCS Toronto FM Communications Society.
We are contacting the CN Tower and promoting they REMOVE the amateur radio repeater run by TFMCS Toronto FM Communications Society.
Canada Lands Company (CN Tower) - WE CONTACTED YOU TO HAVE THE REPEATER REMOVED
DMR repeater Toronto CANADA use of "gestapo" PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU disgraceful conduct
DMR repeater Toronto CANADA use of "Gestapo" PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU disgraceful conduct. "your conversation"
An open letter to the DMR repeater owner in TORONTO CANADA
tinyurl.com/ve3ku
My drive into the city of Toronto today with Family and Friends in the car Thursday December 22 at 3:00 - 3:30 was received with the conversations similar from the analog repeaters in a typical abusive manor. That ranged from the HAM radio alienating conversations for the hours and his resentment. The eliteness has not been experienced since TFMCS repeater ve3twr ..... at the time thoughts of : "when will his batteries die".
The company in my car was "disgusted" by the repeat reference and use of the word "Gestapo" in his conversation and based on the etymology of the word it sicken many Jewish people. Other emails received that day said it disgusted many individual listening on the DMR repeater and it was typical of hatred from the TFMCS PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU. Is that what we are now on DMR? Is that who we now are? It is abusive from etymology of the word and degrade "Judaism". On DMR the conversation have been recently narcissistic and full of innuendos and negative discussions.
He sound like a smug __ with his comments about "data points"
He seems to be a good writer and story teller, but his blog is filled with so much blatant lies and hatred, is this someone that is representatives of TFMCS and the VE3TWR repeater in Toronto CANADA.
I hope PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU HATRED may stop .
An open letter to the DMR repeater owner in TORONTO CANADA
tinyurl.com/ve3ku
My drive into the city of Toronto today with Family and Friends in the car Thursday December 22 at 3:00 - 3:30 was received with the conversations similar from the analog repeaters in a typical abusive manor. That ranged from the HAM radio alienating conversations for the hours and his resentment. The eliteness has not been experienced since TFMCS repeater ve3twr ..... at the time thoughts of : "when will his batteries die".
The company in my car was "disgusted" by the repeat reference and use of the word "Gestapo" in his conversation and based on the etymology of the word it sicken many Jewish people. Other emails received that day said it disgusted many individual listening on the DMR repeater and it was typical of hatred from the TFMCS PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU. Is that what we are now on DMR? Is that who we now are? It is abusive from etymology of the word and degrade "Judaism". On DMR the conversation have been recently narcissistic and full of innuendos and negative discussions.
He sound like a smug __ with his comments about "data points"
I DO NOT understand the resentment and why the alienating conversations over the last two weeks since PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU started using DMR. Where is his hatred coming from? Please help me understand the repeated daily abusive use of the word "Gestapo" and his alienating conversations "we are DStar" or "We are analog" innuendos. Why use a system with so much condemn for it.
I fail to understand the hatred and suttle innuendos that have been recent, over the last week or two weeks since PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU started using DMR. Why use DMR if you condemn it and favorable to other modes DStar. As said by many, just because you can get the cheapest DMR radio and bitter that DStar cost more for a radio.
I join the (MARC) Motorola Amateur Radio Club. I do not care who uses what device or mode. I passionately Love this hobby with all my heart, it saddens me what it has become.
He seems to be a good writer and story teller, but his blog is filled with so much blatant lies and hatred, is this someone that is representatives of TFMCS and the VE3TWR repeater in Toronto CANADA.
I hope PAUL BRISCOE VE3KU HATRED may stop .